Skip to content
SuperMoney logo
SuperMoney logo

Adjustable Pegs in Currency Exchange: Functionality, Examples, and Risks

Last updated 04/25/2024 by

Abi Bus

Edited by

Fact checked by

Summary:
An in-depth exploration of adjustable pegs in currency exchange, elucidating their functionality, historical roots, and real-world applications. This comprehensive guide analyzes the pros and cons of adjustable peg systems, offering insights into their impact on international trade and economic stability.

Understanding adjustable pegs: Balancing stability and flexibility in currency exchange

An adjustable peg is a mechanism used in international currency exchange, providing a middle ground between fixed exchange rate regimes and freely floating currencies. This article delves into the intricacies of adjustable pegs, elucidating their functionality, historical roots, real-world applications, and associated benefits and drawbacks.

Functionality of adjustable pegs

Adjustable pegs allow a country’s currency to fluctuate within a narrow band against a specified base currency, typically a major currency like the U.S. dollar or euro. Unlike a fixed exchange rate, where the currency is pegged rigidly to a specific value, an adjustable peg provides a degree of flexibility. However, this flexibility is limited, usually around 2% against the pegged currency.
When the exchange rate deviates beyond the agreed-upon band, the country’s central bank intervenes to maintain the target exchange rate at the peg. This intervention can take various forms, such as buying or selling foreign currency reserves to stabilize the exchange rate.
The adjustable peg system allows for periodic adjustments to the peg itself, reflecting changes in economic conditions, trade dynamics, or macroeconomic trends. These adjustments aim to ensure the country’s competitiveness in the global market while maintaining stability in currency values.

Historical context: From Bretton Woods to modern practices

The concept of adjustable pegs traces its origins to the post-World War II era, particularly the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference held in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, in 1944. At Bretton Woods, the participating nations established a framework for international monetary cooperation, including fixed exchange rates pegged to the price of gold. Under this system, the U.S. dollar emerged as a key reserve currency linked to the value of gold, with other currencies pegged to the dollar.
However, the Bretton Woods Agreement began to unravel in the late 1960s due to concerns over the overvaluation of the U.S. dollar. President Richard Nixon’s decision to temporarily suspend the dollar’s convertibility to gold in 1971 marked the end of the Bretton Woods system.
Following the collapse of Bretton Woods, countries adopted various exchange rate arrangements, including adjustable pegs. While some nations maintained fixed pegs to major currencies, others opted for more flexible arrangements that allowed for periodic adjustments based on economic conditions.

Real-world examples of adjustable pegs

One of the most notable examples of an adjustable peg system is the relationship between the Chinese yuan (CNY) and the U.S. dollar. Initially, China tightly pegged the yuan to the dollar, but later adopted a system where the yuan is allowed to fluctuate within a narrow band, typically between 0.3% and 0.5%, before intervention.
This arrangement benefits China as an exporter by maintaining a relatively weak currency, making its exports more competitive in global markets. Additionally, the stable exchange rate between the yuan and the dollar facilitates trade and investment between China and the United States.
WEIGH THE RISKS AND BENEFITS
Here is a list of the benefits and the drawbacks to consider.
Pros
  • Enhanced export competitiveness: Adjustable pegs allow countries to maintain a competitive edge in the global market by ensuring their currencies remain relatively weak, making exports more affordable for foreign buyers.
  • Greater stability in currency values: By pegging their currencies to a major currency like the U.S. dollar, countries can achieve greater stability in exchange rates, reducing uncertainty for businesses and investors.
  • Allows for strategic economic adjustments: The flexibility inherent in adjustable peg systems enables countries to respond to changing economic conditions and adjust their exchange rates accordingly, supporting economic growth and stability.
Cons
  • Potential for currency manipulation: Adjustable pegs can be vulnerable to manipulation by governments or central banks seeking to gain a competitive advantage in international trade, leading to distortions in exchange rates.
  • May create anti-competitive trading environments: Critics argue that adjustable pegs can result in unfair trading practices, as countries may artificially undervalue their currencies to boost exports, potentially harming competitors and distorting global trade.
  • Risk of overvaluation or undervaluation: Despite their intended flexibility, adjustable pegs can still lead to misalignments in exchange rates, posing risks of overvaluation or undervaluation that may disrupt economic stability and exacerbate trade imbalances.

Frequently asked questions

How do adjustable pegs differ from fixed exchange rates?

Adjustable pegs provide a degree of flexibility in exchange rates, allowing currencies to fluctuate within a narrow band against a specified base currency. In contrast, fixed exchange rates peg currencies rigidly to a specific value, with no room for adjustment.

Why do countries adopt adjustable pegs instead of fixed or floating exchange rates?

Countries may choose adjustable pegs to balance the benefits of fixed exchange rates, such as greater stability, with the flexibility needed to respond to changing economic conditions and global market dynamics. Adjustable pegs offer a middle ground that allows for strategic economic adjustments while maintaining stability in currency values.

What are the risks associated with adjustable pegs?

Adjustable pegs can pose risks of currency manipulation, anti-competitive trading environments, and misalignments in exchange rates. Governments or central banks may attempt to manipulate exchange rates to gain unfair advantages in international trade, potentially distorting market mechanisms and exacerbating trade imbalances.

Are there any alternatives to adjustable pegs?

Yes, there are alternative exchange rate regimes, such as fixed exchange rates and freely floating exchange rates. Fixed exchange rates involve pegging a currency to a specific value, while freely floating exchange rates allow currencies to fluctuate based on market demand and supply. Each regime has its advantages and disadvantages, and countries may choose the one that best aligns with their economic goals and circumstances.

How do adjustable pegs impact international trade?

Adjustable pegs can influence international trade by affecting the competitiveness of a country’s exports. By maintaining a relatively weak currency, countries with adjustable pegs may make their exports more affordable in foreign markets, potentially boosting export volumes. However, adjustable pegs can also lead to trade imbalances and tensions if not managed effectively.

Key takeaways

  • Adjustable pegs in currency exchange provide a balance between stability and flexibility, allowing countries to adjust their exchange rates within a narrow band against a specified base currency.
  • Historically rooted in the post-World War II era, adjustable pegs emerged as a response to the collapse of fixed exchange rate systems like Bretton Woods, offering a middle ground between fixed and floating exchange rates.
  • Real-world examples, such as the relationship between the Chinese yuan and the U.S. dollar, illustrate the practical application of adjustable peg systems in supporting export competitiveness and maintaining currency stability.
  • While adjustable pegs offer benefits such as enhanced export competitiveness and greater stability, they also pose risks such as currency manipulation, anti-competitive trading environments, and exchange rate misalignments.

Share this post:

You might also like