Skip to content
SuperMoney logo
SuperMoney logo

Building and Loan Associations (B&Ls): Definition, Operations, and Impact on Homeownership

Last updated 03/15/2024 by

Alessandra Nicole

Edited by

Fact checked by

Summary:
Building and loan associations (B&Ls) revolutionized accessibility to home loans between the 1830s and the 1930s as mutually held financial institutions. Members pooled funds, enabling dividends and mortgages. Post-1930s, B&Ls transitioned into federally regulated savings and loan (S&L) institutions. This article explores the history, operations, and transition of B&Ls to S&Ls, focusing on their impact on middle-class homeownership.

Understanding a building and loan association (B&L)

Building and loan associations (B&Ls), or thrifts, originated from collective financial endeavors where individuals contributed membership fees and subscribed to shares with predetermined maturity values. Members committed to monthly payments until shares matured, facilitating access to mortgage loans. For example, with five shares each valued at $600, an individual could borrow up to $3,000. Acquiring loans often involved competitive bidding due to capital constraints. Even after loan acquisition, members continued share payments until fulfillment.

Share-accumulation model

B&Ls predominantly adopted a share-accumulation model, with members purchasing shares to secure home purchases. Initially structured as “terminating” plans that concluded upon loan repayment, B&Ls transitioned to “serial plans,” issuing new shares periodically with distinct termination dates. This evolution led to “permanent plans,” facilitating flexible membership enrollment.

History of building and loan associations (B&Ls)

Influenced by British building societies during the Industrial Revolution, B&Ls emerged in the United States in 1831, pioneered by two factory workers in Philadelphia. These local cooperatives proliferated across the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic by the 1870s, fueled by rising skilled labor incomes. Despite economic downturns, B&Ls flourished, peaking in 1927 with over 12,000 associations serving 11 million members.

Impact on middle-class homeownership

Traditional bank loan requirements, characterized by substantial down payments and short repayment periods, hindered middle-class homeownership. B&Ls circumvented these obstacles, allowing members to purchase shares and borrow against their value for real estate acquisitions. This facilitated homeownership among skilled laborers lacking upfront capital but possessing increased earnings potential.

Building and loans (B&Ls) vs. savings and loans (S&Ls)

Amid the Great Depression’s upheaval, B&Ls faced financial strain, prompting government intervention. Federal charters for savings and loan (S&L) institutions were introduced, offering critical support. Provisions from the Federal Home Loan Bank Board enabled cash-strapped S&Ls to access capital, while the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) provided deposit guarantees, stabilizing thrifts amidst economic turmoil.
WEIGH THE RISKS AND BENEFITS
Here is a list of the benefits and the drawbacks to consider.
Pros
  • Enhanced accessibility to home loans
  • Facilitated middle-class homeownership
  • Promoted financial cooperation and mutual self-help
Cons
  • Competitive loan acquisition process
  • Capital limitations impacting loan availability
  • Transition to federally regulated S&Ls resulted in loss of autonomy

Frequently asked questions

How did B&Ls differ from traditional banks?

B&Ls offered accessible home loans through member contributions and shared dividends, while banks had stricter loan requirements.

What caused the decline of B&Ls?

The Great Depression and financial strain led to the transition of B&Ls into federally regulated S&L institutions.

What role did B&Ls play in promoting homeownership?

B&Ls facilitated middle-class homeownership by providing alternative financing options with manageable repayment terms.

Key takeaways

  • B&Ls revolutionized home ownership accessibility through mutual financial cooperation.
  • Members pooled funds to secure mortgages, promoting middle-class homeownership.
  • The transition to federally regulated S&Ls marked the end of B&L autonomy.

Share this post:

You might also like