Skip to content
SuperMoney logo
SuperMoney logo

DLOM: Definition, Methods, and Real-world Scenarios

Last updated 03/28/2024 by

Bamigbola Paul

Edited by

Fact checked by

Summary:
Explore the intricacies of discounts for lack of marketability (DLOM) and learn how these discounts influence the valuation of closely held and restricted shares. Discover the methods used to quantify DLOM and the challenges valuation analysts face in various tax contexts. Uncover the factors contributing to the consensus DLOM range of 30% to 50% and gain insights into the IRS guidance on related issues.

Understanding discounts for lack of marketability (DLOM)

Discounts for lack of marketability (DLOM) play a crucial role in determining the value of closely held and restricted shares. This valuation method hinges on the idea that a significant discount exists between publicly traded stocks, which have an active market, and privately held stocks, often lacking a robust marketplace.

The methods of quantifying DLOM

Three primary methods are employed to quantify DLOM:

The restricted stock method

The restricted stock method asserts that the only discernible difference between a company’s common stock and its restricted stock lies in the marketability of the latter. The resulting price difference between the two is attributed to the lack of marketability of the restricted stock.

The IPO method

The IPO method examines the price disparity between shares sold pre-IPO and post-IPO. The percentage difference between these two prices is considered the DLOM using this method.

The option pricing method

The option pricing method determines DLOM based on the option’s price and the strike price. The percentage of the option price relative to the strike price is deemed the DLOM under this method.

Challenges associated with discounts for lack of marketability

Noncontrolling, nonmarketable ownership interests in closely held companies present unique challenges for valuation analysts, particularly in the context of tax disputes. The IRS offers guidance, addressing issues like discount for lack of liquidity (DLOL) and discount for lack of control (DLOC).

Discount for lack of liquidity (DLOL) and discount for lack of control (DLOC)

Selling an interest in a privately held company is a complex and time-consuming process compared to liquidating a position in a publicly traded entity. The owner’s ability to achieve liquidity in a timely manner significantly impacts the value of the investment. Factors like additional costs, increased uncertainty, and longer time horizons contribute to privately held companies selling at a discount to intrinsic value.
Weigh the risks and benefits
Here is a list of the benefits and drawbacks to consider.
Pros
  • Facilitates valuation of closely held and restricted shares
  • Provides a methodical approach to determining marketability discounts
  • Guidance from the IRS aids in addressing related issues
Cons
  • Challenges in accurately quantifying DLOM
  • Varied interpretations of the consensus DLOM range
  • Complexities in applying DLOM in different tax contexts

Real-world examples of discounts for lack of marketability

Examining practical instances where discounts for lack of marketability come into play provides a clearer understanding of their impact on valuation.

Example 1: family-owned businesses

In family-owned businesses, shares often lack a ready market. When a family member wishes to sell their stake, the absence of an active marketplace can lead to a significant discount. This scenario highlights the practical application of DLOM in valuing shares with limited marketability.

Example 2: private equity investments

Private equity investments in startups or unlisted companies face challenges in finding buyers due to the restricted nature of these shares. Investors looking to exit their positions may experience a lower valuation than if the shares were publicly traded. DLOM plays a crucial role in determining the fair value of these investments in the absence of market liquidity.

Advanced valuation techniques beyond DLOM

While discounts for lack of marketability are integral to valuation, incorporating additional advanced techniques enhances the precision of the overall valuation process.

Option pricing models in detail

Delving deeper into option pricing models as a method for determining DLOM reveals intricate calculations involving volatility, time to expiration, and interest rates. Understanding these nuances provides valuation analysts with a more comprehensive toolkit for precise valuation in diverse scenarios.

Marketability period analysis

Conducting a marketability period analysis involves assessing the anticipated time it takes for an investment to become liquid. This forward-looking approach allows valuation professionals to incorporate the time factor into their calculations, offering a more nuanced perspective on the impact of marketability on share valuation.

The bottom line

Discounts for lack of marketability are a critical component of the valuation landscape, influencing the perceived value of closely held and restricted shares. From real-world examples to advanced valuation techniques, understanding the multifaceted nature of DLOM enhances the accuracy of the valuation process. As businesses continue to evolve, valuation professionals must leverage comprehensive methodologies to ensure a nuanced and precise approach to determining marketability discounts.

Frequently asked questions

What is the significance of DLOM in business valuation?

DLOM, or discount for lack of marketability, is crucial in determining the value of closely held and restricted shares. It accounts for the difference between publicly traded stocks, which have an active market, and privately held stocks, often lacking a robust marketplace.

How do the restricted stock, IPO, and option pricing methods quantify DLOM?

The restricted stock method attributes the price difference between common stock and restricted stock to the lack of marketability. The IPO method calculates the percentage difference in shares sold pre-IPO and post-IPO as the DLOM. The option pricing method determines DLOM based on the option’s price relative to the strike price.

What challenges do valuation analysts face in dealing with DLOM in tax disputes?

Valuation analysts encounter challenges, especially in tax disputes, with noncontrolling, nonmarketable ownership interests in closely held companies. The IRS provides guidance, addressing issues like discount for lack of liquidity (DLOL) and discount for lack of control (DLOC).

Can you provide examples illustrating the practical application of DLOM?

Real-world examples include family-owned businesses, where shares may lack a ready market, leading to a significant discount when selling a stake. Private equity investments in startups or unlisted companies also face challenges in finding buyers, impacting the fair value of these shares.

What are some advanced valuation techniques beyond DLOM?

Beyond DLOM, valuation professionals use advanced techniques like option pricing models, involving intricate calculations of volatility, time to expiration, and interest rates. Marketability period analysis assesses the anticipated time for an investment to become liquid, offering a nuanced perspective on share valuation.

Key takeaways

  • DLOM is instrumental in valuing closely held and restricted shares.
  • Three primary methods—restricted stock, IPO, and option pricing—are used to quantify DLOM.
  • IRS guidance addresses challenges like DLOL and DLOC in the valuation process.
  • Consensus DLOM range is typically between 30% to 50%.

Share this post:

You might also like