Skip to content
SuperMoney logo
SuperMoney logo

Entity-Purchase Agreements: Definition, Examples, and Benefits

Last updated 03/15/2024 by

Silas Bamigbola

Edited by

Fact checked by

Summary:
An entity-purchase agreement is a vital aspect of business succession planning, particularly for companies with multiple owners. This agreement outlines how a partner’s share of the business will be reassigned if they pass away or leave the company. It typically involves the company obtaining insurance policies on each partner, with proceeds used to buy out a deceased partner’s share. This article delves deeper into the intricacies of entity-purchase agreements, their benefits, and how they compare to other types of buy and sell agreements.

Understanding entity-purchase agreements

An entity-purchase agreement, often referred to as a buy and sell agreement, is a legally binding contract designed to facilitate the smooth transition of ownership in businesses with multiple partners. It outlines the terms under which a partner’s interest in the company will be bought out in the event of their death, disability, retirement, or other specified circumstances.

Key components of an entity-purchase agreement

Entity-purchase agreements typically include several key components:
  • Identification of triggering events such as death, disability, retirement, divorce, bankruptcy, or termination
  • Consent of each owner to sell their interest under specified circumstances
  • Procurement of life or disability insurance policies on each partner
  • Specification of the purchase price, which may be a fixed amount or determined by a formula
  • Provisions for funding the buyout, which may include company funds, insurance proceeds, or other financing options

Entity-purchase agreement vs. cross-purchase agreement

When considering succession planning and ownership transitions in businesses with multiple partners, two common approaches are entity-purchase agreements and cross-purchase agreements. While both serve the same fundamental purpose, they differ in their structure and implementation.
Entity-purchase agreement: In an entity-purchase agreement, the business entity itself is responsible for purchasing life insurance policies on each partner. In the event of a triggering event, such as the death or departure of a partner, the business entity receives the insurance proceeds and uses them to buy out the departing partner’s ownership interest.
Cross-purchase agreement: Contrastingly, in a cross-purchase agreement, each partner individually purchases life insurance policies on the lives of the other partners. In the event of a triggering event, the surviving partners receive the insurance proceeds directly and use them to buy out the ownership interest of the deceased or departing partner.
While both types of agreements achieve the goal of facilitating ownership transitions, they have distinct advantages and disadvantages. Entity-purchase agreements may simplify administration since the business entity manages the insurance policies and buyout process. However, cross-purchase agreements allow for more straightforward valuation and customization of buyout terms between individual partners.
The choice between an entity-purchase agreement and a cross-purchase agreement depends on factors such as the number of partners, the complexity of ownership structures, and tax considerations. Ultimately, consulting with legal and financial advisors can help businesses select the most suitable approach for their unique circumstances.

Benefits of entity-purchase agreements

Entity-purchase agreements offer several advantages:
  • Smooth transition of ownership
  • Financial security for surviving partners and the deceased partner’s family
  • Prevention of forced sale of assets
  • Avoidance of out-of-pocket expenses for partners

Pros and cons of entity-purchase agreements

Weigh the risks and benefits
Here is a list of the benefits and drawbacks to consider.
Pros
  • Smooth transition of ownership
  • Financial security for surviving partners and families
  • Prevention of forced sale of assets
Cons
  • Complexity in administration and funding
  • Potential for disputes over valuation and terms
  • Dependency on insurance availability and affordability

Examples of entity-purchase agreements

Consider the following scenarios that illustrate the application of entity-purchase agreements:
  • Scenario 1: A small business with three partners decides to implement an entity-purchase agreement to ensure continuity in the event of one partner’s death. Each partner agrees to allow the company to purchase their share of the business using proceeds from life insurance policies.
  • Scenario 2: A family-owned corporation seeks to protect the interests of its shareholders by drafting an entity-purchase agreement that outlines the terms for buying out shares in the event of retirement or disability.
  • Scenario 3: A professional partnership establishes an entity-purchase agreement to address potential conflicts that may arise if one partner decides to leave the practice. The agreement specifies the process for valuing the departing partner’s share and ensures a fair buyout.

Tax implications of entity-purchase agreements

Entity-purchase agreements can have significant tax implications for both the company and its partners. Understanding the tax treatment of buyouts and insurance proceeds is essential for proper financial planning.
Generally, the proceeds from life insurance policies used to fund buyouts are tax-free to the beneficiaries, provided certain conditions are met. However, the tax treatment of the buyout itself depends on various factors, including the structure of the agreement and applicable tax laws.

Legal considerations in drafting entity-purchase agreements

When drafting an entity-purchase agreement, it’s crucial to consider various legal aspects to ensure the agreement is enforceable and meets the needs of all parties involved.
Key legal considerations may include:
  • Compliance: Ensuring compliance with state laws governing business agreements and succession planning.
  • Dispute resolution: Including provisions for resolving disputes among partners regarding valuation, triggering events, or interpretation of the agreement.
  • Documentation: Properly documenting the agreement and ensuring all parties fully understand their rights and obligations.
  • Review and updates: Periodically reviewing and updating the agreement to reflect changes in ownership, business structure, or legal requirements.

Conclusion

Entity-purchase agreements play a vital role in business succession planning, providing a structured framework for the smooth transition of ownership in companies with multiple partners. By outlining the terms and procedures for buying out a partner’s share in the event of death, disability, retirement, or other specified circumstances, these agreements help mitigate potential disputes and ensure continuity in business operations.
While entity-purchase agreements offer numerous benefits, including financial security and peace of mind for partners and their families, they require careful planning and execution. It is essential for businesses to thoroughly assess their needs, consider various agreement structures, and seek professional guidance to develop comprehensive and effective entity-purchase agreements.
By understanding the key components, benefits, and considerations associated with entity-purchase agreements, businesses can proactively address succession planning challenges and safeguard their long-term viability and success.

Frequently asked questions

What events can trigger an entity-purchase agreement?

An entity-purchase agreement can be triggered by various events, including the death, disability, retirement, divorce, bankruptcy, termination, or other specified circumstances of a partner.

Who typically initiates the creation of an entity-purchase agreement?

The creation of an entity-purchase agreement is typically initiated by the partners or shareholders of a business, often in consultation with legal and financial advisors.

What role does insurance play in an entity-purchase agreement?

Insurance plays a crucial role in funding buyouts under an entity-purchase agreement. The company usually takes out life or disability insurance policies on each partner to provide the necessary funds to purchase their share in the event of a triggering event.

Can the terms of an entity-purchase agreement be amended?

Yes, the terms of an entity-purchase agreement can be amended by mutual agreement among the partners. It is essential to review and update the agreement periodically to ensure it remains relevant and effective.

What happens if a triggering event occurs, but the company does not have adequate insurance coverage?

If a triggering event occurs, but the company does not have adequate insurance coverage, alternative funding mechanisms may need to be explored. This could involve using company funds, obtaining financing, or negotiating with the affected parties.

Are entity-purchase agreements legally binding?

Yes, entity-purchase agreements are legally binding contracts that outline the terms and conditions under which a partner’s share of the business will be bought out in the event of a triggering event. Once signed, the parties are typically obligated to adhere to the terms of the agreement.

Can entity-purchase agreements be used in partnerships as well as corporations?

Yes, entity-purchase agreements can be used in partnerships as well as corporations. The structure and specific terms of the agreement may vary depending on the type of business entity and the preferences of the partners or shareholders involved.

Key takeaways

  • An entity-purchase agreement facilitates the smooth transition of ownership in businesses with multiple partners.
  • It involves the company purchasing insurance policies on each partner to fund buyouts in the event of specified triggering events.
  • Entity-purchase agreements offer financial security and peace of mind to partners and their families.

Share this post:

You might also like