What Are Extraordinary Items? Definition, Impact on Financial Statements, and Post-2015 Dynamics
AB
Summary:
Explore the nuanced world of extraordinary items in financial accounting, diving into their historical significance, the evolution prompted by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in 2015, and the current reporting landscape. This in-depth analysis encompasses the criteria for an event to be deemed extraordinary, the impact on financial statements, and the pros and cons of the discontinuation. Discover the intricacies of reporting requirements post-2015, along with insights into how the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) differ in their treatment of extraordinary items.
Understanding extraordinary items in financial accounting
Extraordinary items, once a distinctive feature on financial statements, were gains or losses resulting from events considered both unusual and infrequent. These items were meticulously classified, presented, and disclosed to enhance transparency in financial reporting. Typically found in the notes to financial statements, extraordinary items were segregated from operating earnings due to their one-time nature, not expected to recur.
The landscape changed significantly in January 2015 when the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) decided to eliminate the concept of extraordinary items. Despite this transformation, companies are still required to report nonrecurring items, ensuring transparency and accountability in financial disclosures. This shift aimed to reduce the cost and complexity associated with preparing financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Historical significance
Before 2015, companies invested substantial effort in determining whether an event qualified as extraordinary. Gains and losses, net of taxes, were separately shown on the income statement after income from continuing operations. The FASB’s decision to discontinue the accounting treatment for extraordinary items removed the need for companies and auditors to identify events as rare, starting in fiscal year 2015.
Impact on financial statements
While the concept of extraordinary items faded away, reporting and disclosure requirements for unusual and infrequent events remained intact. Companies no longer needed to designate events as extraordinary, but they still had to disclose such events on the income statement and assess their impact before income taxes. GAAP allowed companies to provide more specific names for these events, such as “effects from fire at production facility.”
It’s noteworthy that the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) do not include extraordinary items in their accounting standards, highlighting a divergence in the treatment of such events globally.
Criteria for an extraordinary item
An event or transaction was considered extraordinary if it was both unusual and infrequent. An unusual event had to be highly abnormal and unrelated to the typical operating activities of a company, with no expectation of recurrence. This criteria shift simplified reporting, as companies no longer needed to segregate the effect of extraordinary items on the income statement or estimate income taxes and earnings-per-share impact.
Examples of extraordinary items included losses from catastrophic events like earthquakes, tsunamis, and wildfires. While certain events, such as fires, were easy to designate and estimate, others with an indirect impact on company operations posed greater challenges.
Reporting requirements post-2015
The elimination of extraordinary items prompted changes in reporting dynamics. Companies were relieved from the task of determining whether an event was rare enough to qualify as extraordinary. However, reporting and disclosure requirements for unusual and infrequent events remained integral to financial transparency.
While companies no longer needed to describe events as extraordinary, they still had to disclose infrequent and unusual events on the income statement and assess their effect before income taxes. This flexibility allowed companies to assign more specific names to events, providing clarity to stakeholders.
Frequently asked questions
How did the FASB’s elimination of extraordinary items impact financial reporting?
The FASB’s decision aimed to streamline financial reporting by discontinuing the accounting treatment for extraordinary items in January 2015, reducing cost and complexity.
Do companies still disclose nonrecurring items post-2015?
Yes, companies are still required to report nonrecurring items, such as income from land sales, ensuring transparency in financial disclosures.
What led to the discontinuation of extraordinary items?
The FASB aimed to reduce the cost and complexity of preparing financial statements, prompting the elimination of extraordinary items in 2015.
How do the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) treat extraordinary items?
The IFRS does not include extraordinary items in its accounting standards, showcasing a global difference in treatment.
What events are considered extraordinary?
An event is deemed extraordinary if it is both unusual and infrequent, with no expectation of recurrence and being highly abnormal in relation to a company’s typical operating activities.
How has the elimination of extraordinary items affected the naming of events?
With the flexibility provided by the post-2015 reporting landscape, companies can now give more specific names to events, enhancing clarity for stakeholders.
Key takeaways
- The FASB eliminated the concept of extraordinary items in January 2015, aiming to streamline financial reporting.
- Companies must still disclose nonrecurring items, ensuring transparency and accountability in financial disclosures.
- An event was deemed extraordinary if it was both unusual and infrequent, with no expectation of recurrence.
- Reporting and disclosure requirements for unusual and infrequent events remain intact post-2015.
- The IFRS does not include extraordinary items in its accounting standards, showcasing a global difference in treatment.
Share this post: