Skip to content
SuperMoney logo
SuperMoney logo

Fat Finger Errors: Definition, Impact, and Prevention

Last updated 03/19/2024 by

Silas Bamigbola

Edited by

Fact checked by

Summary:
Fat finger errors, commonly caused by human input mistakes, can have substantial consequences, especially in financial markets. This article explores the definition of fat finger errors, their implications, real-life examples, and how to prevent them. Learn how setting limits, requiring authorization, and implementing automation can mitigate the risks. Discover how the 2010 “flash crash” led to a closer examination of these errors. If you want to safeguard your financial dealings, understanding and avoiding fat finger errors is crucial.

Compare Investment Advisors

Compare the services, fees, and features of the leading investment advisors. Find the best firm for your portfolio.
Compare Investment Advisors

Fat finger error definition

A fat finger error, also known as a “fat finger mistake,” is a human error resulting from unintentionally pressing the wrong key or keys when entering data using a computer or other electronic device. These errors can occur in various contexts, but they are particularly significant in financial and trading environments.

Understanding fat finger errors

Fat finger errors are usually harmless but can sometimes have a significant market impact. For instance, if a trader is instructed to sell 1,000 shares of a company’s stock but mistakenly enters 1,000,000 shares for sale at market price, the consequences can be substantial. This type of error has the potential to transact with every buy order at the bid price until it is completely filled.
Most brokerage firms, investment banks, and hedge funds implement filters in their trading platforms to alert traders to inputs that fall outside typical market parameters. These measures help prevent erroneous orders from being placed. Furthermore, major U.S. stock exchanges mandate the reporting of erroneous trades within 30 minutes of execution.
In a notable incident, the May 6, 2010, “flash crash” led to significant, rapid, and unexpected drops in U.S. stock indexes. Initially, a fat finger error was suspected, with a trader supposedly entering an order in the billions instead of millions. However, subsequent investigations by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) revealed that the flash crash was caused by false sell orders from a high-frequency trading algorithm.

Examples of fat finger trading errors

Some prominent examples of fat finger trading errors include:

1. British pound plunge (2016)

In 2016, a fat finger error was blamed for causing a 6% plunge in the British pound, illustrating how even minor input mistakes can have far-reaching consequences.

2. Deutsche Bank’s $6 billion mishap (2015)

A junior Deutsche Bank employee mistakenly transferred $6 billion to a hedge fund in 2015 due to an incorrect entry of the “gross figure” instead of the net value. Fortunately, Deutsche Bank managed to retrieve the funds the following day.

3. Mizuho Securities’ $600 billion orders (2014)

In 2014, a trader at Mizuho Securities accidentally placed orders for over $600 billion in leading Japanese stocks. This occurred because price and data volume were entered in the same column. Fortunately, most of the orders were canceled before execution.

Preventing fat finger errors

To reduce the risk of fat finger errors, firms can implement several processes and procedures, including:

1. Set limits

Setting limits on trading platforms can help prevent errors. Filters can be established to prevent trades above specific dollar or volume amounts. For example, if an order exceeds $2 million or 500,000 shares, it could trigger an alert.

2. Authorization requirements

Requiring authorization for trades over a specified amount can reduce fat finger errors. For instance, a securities firm might mandate that the head trader authorize and release trades that exceed $500,000.

3. Automation

Using trading algorithms and straight-through processing to enter orders minimizes the risk of fat finger errors. Manually entering a large number of orders during a trading day can be tedious and increase the likelihood of mistakes. Orders that directly feed into the firm’s trading system reduce the risk of human error.

Consequences of fat finger errors

Fat finger errors, as seemingly innocuous as they may be, can result in various consequences, particularly in financial settings. These consequences can extend beyond financial losses and market disruptions. Let’s explore some of these impacts:

1. Financial losses beyond imagination

In some extreme cases, fat finger errors have led to financial losses that are difficult to fathom. For instance, a trader mistakenly entering an extra zero when inputting an order can result in millions or even billions of dollars in losses. Such errors can devastate an individual’s or a company’s financial health.

2. Damage to reputation

Beyond the immediate financial impact, fat finger errors can tarnish a trader’s or a firm’s reputation. In the highly competitive world of finance, even a single high-profile mistake can lead to a loss of trust and credibility in the market.

The human element in financial transactions

One of the key aspects of fat finger errors is their reliance on human input. In an increasingly automated and algorithm-driven financial world, these errors serve as a reminder of the importance of the human element. Let’s delve deeper into this aspect:

1. The role of human input

Despite the advancements in technology and algorithmic trading, the human element remains integral to financial transactions. Traders, analysts, and financial professionals still play a vital role in decision-making and executing orders.

2. Combating human error

To combat human error, financial firms invest in training, implementing stringent risk management procedures, and continually improving their trading systems. It’s a delicate balance between utilizing technology for efficiency and ensuring that human judgment prevails in critical decision-making.

Recent developments and regulatory changes

In the wake of high-profile fat finger errors and flash crashes, regulatory bodies and financial institutions have taken steps to mitigate the risks associated with these mistakes. Let’s explore some of the recent developments:

1. Regulatory scrutiny

Regulators have become more vigilant in monitoring trading activities, especially in high-frequency and algorithmic trading environments. They impose stricter reporting requirements and examine trading practices to identify and address potential fat finger errors.

2. Circuit breakers and halts

Many stock exchanges have introduced circuit breakers and trading halts to prevent extreme market volatility triggered by fat finger errors. These mechanisms temporarily suspend trading to allow markets to stabilize and prevent a cascading impact.

The future of fat finger error prevention

As technology continues to advance, the prevention and management of fat finger errors are evolving. Financial institutions are exploring innovative solutions to reduce the likelihood of these mistakes:

1. Machine learning and artificial intelligence

Machine learning and artificial intelligence are being deployed to monitor trading patterns and detect unusual behavior that may indicate a fat finger error. These technologies can act swiftly to alert traders and prevent erroneous orders from executing.

2. Behavioral biometrics

Some firms are exploring behavioral biometrics to identify unique patterns in traders’ behavior. By analyzing keystrokes and mouse movements, systems can detect deviations that suggest a potential input error and trigger alerts.

Conclusion

Fat finger errors can have substantial consequences in various industries, especially in finance. While they are often harmless, the potential for significant market disruption exists. Learning from past incidents, implementing safeguards, and promoting responsible data input can help reduce the risk of these errors.

Frequently asked questions

What is the origin of the term “fat finger error”?

The term “fat finger error” originated from the idea that a person’s finger pressing a key on a keyboard or a touchscreen was too large or imprecise, resulting in an input mistake. It is commonly used to describe human errors when entering data on computers.

Are fat finger errors only relevant to financial markets?

While fat finger errors are most often associated with financial and trading environments, they can occur in various contexts where data entry is involved. However, their potential impact is most significant in financial markets due to the large sums of money involved.

How can individuals and organizations prevent fat finger errors?

Preventing fat finger errors involves setting limits on orders, requiring authorization for high-value trades, and using automation such as trading algorithms. Additionally, implementing rigorous training and risk management procedures can help minimize the risk of these errors.

What was the impact of the 2010 “flash crash,” and was it solely a fat finger error?

The 2010 “flash crash” had a significant impact on U.S. stock indexes, leading to rapid and unexpected drops. While a fat finger error was initially suspected, further investigations revealed that it was caused by false sell orders from a high-frequency trading algorithm. This incident highlighted the need for more comprehensive risk management in financial markets.

What are the future developments in fat finger error prevention?

The future of fat finger error prevention includes the use of machine learning and artificial intelligence to detect unusual trading patterns and behavioral biometrics to identify potential errors. Regulators are also implementing stricter reporting requirements and circuit breakers to prevent extreme market volatility caused by fat finger errors.

Key takeaways

  • Fat finger errors result from human input mistakes and can have substantial consequences.
  • Setting limits, requiring authorization, and using automation can help prevent fat finger errors in financial and trading environments.
  • The 2010 “flash crash” highlighted the importance of identifying and mitigating fat finger errors in the financial industry.

SuperMoney may receive compensation from some or all of the companies featured, and the order of results are influenced by advertising bids, with exception for mortgage and home lending related products. Learn more

Loading results ...

Share this post:

You might also like