Skip to content
SuperMoney logo
SuperMoney logo

Foaming the Runway: Meaning and Adoption in Finance

Last updated 06/05/2024 by

Daniel Dikio

Edited by

Fact checked by

“Foaming the runway” is a metaphorical phrase adopted from aviation, where it originally referred to the process of spraying foam on a runway to prevent fires during emergency landings. In the financial context, it describes a strategy employed by companies facing potential bankruptcy or severe financial distress to buy time and create a smoother path for recovery or a more orderly wind-down.

What is foaming the runway?

Origins in aviation

The term “foaming the runway” has its roots in aviation safety practices. In emergency situations, especially when dealing with aircraft with potential fire hazards, airport emergency crews would spread a blanket of foam on the runway. This foam helps to suppress flames and reduce friction, thereby minimizing the risk of fire upon landing. The practice is designed to provide a controlled environment that can help save lives and reduce damage to the aircraft.

Adoption in finance

The transition of this phrase into financial terminology occurred as a metaphor to describe the actions taken by companies to handle severe financial distress. Just as foam helps an aircraft make a safer landing, financial strategies aimed at “foaming the runway” are intended to soften the impact of a company’s financial decline. This could involve various measures such as cutting costs, liquidating assets, renegotiating debts, or securing emergency funding to prevent a complete financial catastrophe.

Notable examples

Several high-profile companies have employed foaming the runway strategies in recent history. For instance, during the 2008 financial crisis, many financial institutions and corporations adopted these measures to stave off bankruptcy and buy time to restructure their operations. One prominent example is General Motors, which implemented a series of drastic measures, including workforce reductions and asset sales, before eventually filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. These actions were designed to prepare the company for a more controlled reorganization process.

Mechanisms of foaming the runway

Cost-cutting measures

One of the primary strategies in foaming the runway is aggressive cost-cutting. Companies facing financial distress often undertake significant reductions in operating expenses. This can include layoffs, salary cuts, closing underperforming divisions, and renegotiating contracts with suppliers. The goal is to quickly reduce cash outflows to stabilize the financial situation and gain more time to explore long-term solutions.

Asset liquidation

Liquidating non-core or underutilized assets is another common tactic. This might involve selling real estate, equipment, patents, or other valuable holdings to generate immediate cash flow. These sales can provide the liquidity needed to pay down debts or fund critical operations during a period of financial uncertainty.

Renegotiation of debts

Debt renegotiation is crucial for companies trying to foam the runway. This can involve extending the terms of existing loans, reducing interest rates, or converting debt into equity. Renegotiating terms with creditors can help reduce the financial burden on the company and create a more manageable debt repayment schedule.

Securing emergency funding

In some cases, companies may seek emergency funding from investors, banks, or government sources. This can come in the form of bridge loans, equity injections, or other financial instruments designed to provide temporary relief. Such funding can be vital for keeping the company afloat while more permanent solutions are sought.

Role of management and boards

The success of foaming the runway strategies heavily depends on the actions and decisions of the company’s management and board of directors. These leaders must act decisively and transparently, communicating clearly with stakeholders about the company’s financial situation and the steps being taken. Effective leadership can help maintain confidence among investors, employees, and customers during turbulent times.

Case studies

Company A: Lehman Brothers

Lehman Brothers, the global financial services firm, is a textbook example of a company that attempted to foam the runway during the 2008 financial crisis. Facing massive losses due to its exposure to subprime mortgages, Lehman Brothers took several steps to stabilize its situation, including selling assets and cutting jobs. Despite these efforts, the company ultimately failed to secure the necessary capital or a buyer, leading to its bankruptcy. The collapse of Lehman Brothers highlighted the limitations and risks associated with foaming the runway when external market conditions are overwhelmingly negative.

Company B: General Motors

In contrast, General Motors (GM) successfully used foaming the runway strategies to navigate its financial crisis. In the lead-up to its 2009 bankruptcy filing, GM undertook significant cost-cutting measures, closed plants, and sold off non-core brands such as Hummer and Saturn. Additionally, GM secured substantial government bailout funds, which were critical in its restructuring efforts. The company’s proactive measures allowed for a more orderly bankruptcy process and eventual recovery, demonstrating how foaming the runway can facilitate a successful turnaround.

Comparison and lessons learned

Comparing Lehman Brothers and General Motors reveals several key lessons. Lehman’s failure underscores the importance of timing and market conditions; even the best internal strategies may not succeed if external factors are overwhelmingly adverse. GM’s experience, on the other hand, shows the value of comprehensive, multi-faceted approaches that include cost-cutting, asset liquidation, and securing external funding. Additionally, the support from the U.S. government played a crucial role in GM’s recovery, highlighting how external support can be a game-changer in such scenarios.


Potential for recovery or soft landing

Foaming the runway can provide companies with the breathing room needed to implement longer-term recovery strategies. By stabilizing the financial situation, companies can focus on restructuring operations and improving efficiency, which may lead to a turnaround.

Preservation of some shareholder value

Even if complete recovery is not possible, foaming the runway can help preserve some value for shareholders. By avoiding a sudden collapse, the company can manage asset sales and other actions in a more orderly manner, potentially yielding higher returns than a forced liquidation.

Time to restructure or find a buyer

Creating a temporary financial cushion allows companies to explore various strategic options, such as mergers, acquisitions, or deeper operational restructuring. This period can be crucial for finding the best possible outcome for the company and its stakeholders.


Often delays the inevitable

One of the main criticisms of foaming the runway is that it may simply delay an inevitable bankruptcy. In some cases, the measures taken may only provide temporary relief without addressing the underlying structural issues that led to the financial distress.

Potential for further financial damage

If not executed properly, foaming the runway strategies can lead to further financial deterioration. For example, selling off core assets to raise cash can undermine the company’s ability to generate future revenue, exacerbating the financial problems in the long run.

Impact on employees and other stakeholders

Cost-cutting measures and asset sales can have significant negative impacts on employees, customers, and suppliers. Layoffs, reduced services, and broken contracts can damage relationships and erode trust, making it harder for the company to recover in the future.

The role of stakeholders


Shareholders are often the most directly impacted by foaming the runway strategies. While these measures can help preserve some value, they can also lead to dilution of ownership or complete loss of investment if the company eventually goes bankrupt. Clear communication and transparency are critical to maintaining shareholder confidence.


Employees typically bear the brunt of cost-cutting measures, facing layoffs, reduced benefits, or salary cuts. Effective communication and fair treatment are essential to maintaining morale and retaining key talent during these difficult times.


Creditors play a crucial role in the success of foaming the runway strategies. Their willingness to renegotiate debt terms can provide the necessary breathing room for the company. However, if creditors lose confidence, they may push for immediate repayment, precipitating a quicker collapse.


Maintaining customer trust and loyalty is vital for companies undergoing financial distress. Clear communication about the company’s situation and future plans can help reassure customers and prevent a loss of business during the restructuring process.

Legal implications

Bankruptcy laws

Companies considering foaming the runway must navigate complex bankruptcy laws. These laws vary by jurisdiction but generally provide a framework for reorganizing or liquidating the company while protecting the rights of creditors and other stakeholders. Understanding these legal requirements is essential for effective planning and execution of foaming the runway strategies.

Fiduciary duties

Company executives and board members have fiduciary duties to act in the best interests of the company and its shareholders. This includes making informed decisions that balance short-term survival with long-term sustainability. Failure to fulfill these duties can result in legal consequences and loss of stakeholder trust.

Ethical considerations

Transparency with stakeholders

Ethical considerations play a significant role in foaming the runway. Companies must be transparent with stakeholders about their financial situation and the measures being taken. Misleading or withholding information can damage trust and lead to legal repercussions.

Long-term vs. short-term thinking

While foaming the runway focuses on immediate financial stabilization, companies must also consider the long-term implications of their actions. Short-term cost-cutting measures may provide temporary relief but could harm the company’s long-term prospects if they undermine innovation, employee morale, or customer relationships. Balancing short-term survival with long-term sustainability requires careful planning and a clear understanding of the company’s strategic objectives.


What is meant by “foaming the runway” in finance?

“Foaming the runway” refers to the strategic measures taken by companies facing financial distress to mitigate the impact of potential bankruptcy or liquidation. These measures aim to buy time, stabilize the financial situation, and create a smoother path for recovery or wind-down.

Why do companies use foaming the runway strategies?

Companies use foaming the runway strategies to avoid the immediate collapse associated with bankruptcy or financial distress. By implementing cost-cutting measures, asset liquidation, debt renegotiation, or securing emergency funding, companies can create breathing room to explore longer-term solutions and potentially avoid a catastrophic outcome.

Can foaming the runway prevent bankruptcy?

Foaming the runway strategies can delay or mitigate the effects of bankruptcy, but they may not always prevent it entirely. The success of these strategies depends on various factors, including market conditions, the company’s underlying financial health, and the effectiveness of the measures taken. While foaming the runway can buy time and create opportunities for recovery, it may not be a permanent solution if the underlying issues are not addressed.

What are the risks involved with foaming the runway?

Foaming the runway carries several risks, including the potential for further financial deterioration, negative impacts on stakeholders, and legal or ethical challenges. Cost-cutting measures and asset sales can weaken the company’s competitive position and damage relationships with employees, customers, and creditors. Additionally, if foaming the runway is perceived as a desperate or futile effort, it may further erode investor confidence and hasten the company’s decline.

How do shareholders typically react to foaming the runway announcements?

Shareholder reactions to foaming the runway announcements can vary depending on the circumstances and the perceived effectiveness of the strategies. While some shareholders may welcome efforts to stabilize the company and protect their investments, others may view foaming the runway as a sign of weakness or impending failure. Clear communication and transparency from company management are essential to managing shareholder expectations and maintaining trust.

Key takeaways

  • Foaming the runway is a financial strategy employed by companies facing financial distress to mitigate the impact of potential bankruptcy or liquidation.
  • The concept originated from aviation safety practices and involves implementing measures to stabilize the company’s financial situation and buy time for recovery.
  • Foaming the runway strategies include cost-cutting measures, asset liquidation, debt renegotiation, and securing emergency funding.
  • While foaming the runway can provide temporary relief and create opportunities for recovery, it carries risks and may not always prevent bankruptcy.
  • Effective communication, transparency, and ethical considerations are crucial in implementing foaming the runway strategies and managing stakeholder expectations.
  • Balancing short-term survival with long-term sustainability is essential for companies navigating financial distress.

SuperMoney may receive compensation from some or all of the companies featured, and the order of results are influenced by advertising bids, with exception for mortgage and home lending related products. Learn more

Loading results ...

You might also like