Skip to content
SuperMoney logo
SuperMoney logo

The Gold Reserve Act of 1934: Impact, Implementation, and Legal Challenges

Last updated 03/25/2024 by

Alessandra Nicole

Edited by

Fact checked by

Summary:
The Gold Reserve Act of 1934, signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt during the Great Depression, holds crucial importance in the history of U.S. monetary policies. This comprehensive analysis explores the act’s origins, its impact on gold reserves, and its role in stabilizing the nation’s economy during a challenging period in financial history.

The gold reserve act of 1934: an in-depth analysis for finance professionals

Understanding the gold reserve act of 1934

The Gold Reserve Act of 1934, a pivotal response during the Great Depression, was a strategic move to stabilize the U.S. money supply. President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s swift actions, including the national bank holiday and the Emergency Banking Act of 1933, set the stage for this significant legislation.

Executive order 6102 and the gold standard suspension

In April 1933, Executive Order 6102 prohibited the hoarding of gold within the U.S., a precursor to the Gold Reserve Act. Individuals and institutions were mandated to surrender their gold to the Federal Reserve, effectively suspending the gold standard that had been in place for decades.

The gold reserve act in action

Enacted in 1934, the Gold Reserve Act completed the transition of gold from private hands to the U.S. Treasury. Entities, including the Federal Reserve, were required to remit any gold holdings exceeding $100 in value to the government. This legislative move fundamentally transformed gold from a currency to a commodity.

Dollar devaluation and gold standard alteration

The Act fixed the weight of the dollar at 15.715 grains of nine-tenths fine gold, altering the nominal price of gold from $20.67 to $35 per troy ounce. This significant change led to a substantial increase in the Treasury’s gold holdings by $2.81 billion. The fixed gold price remained until 1971 when President Richard Nixon shifted to a fiat currency system.

Special considerations and legal challenges

While the Gold Reserve Act did not technically remove the U.S. from the gold standard, it granted the government greater control over the domestic money supply. The legislation also empowered the Treasury to purchase gold internationally, further influencing the dollar’s value in foreign exchange markets.

U.S. Supreme Court cases

In 1935, legal challenges, including Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad and United States v. Bankers Trust Co., reached the U.S. Supreme Court. These cases questioned the constitutionality of the government’s requisitioning of domestic gold, citing the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition against taking private property for public use without just compensation.
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court affirmed the government’s power to regulate contracts with gold clauses, asserting its authority over the money supply.
WEIGH THE RISKS AND BENEFITS
Here is a list of the benefits and drawbacks associated with the Gold Reserve Act of 1934.
Pros
  • Stabilized the U.S. money supply during the Great Depression.
  • Increased the Treasury’s gold holdings, influencing the dollar’s international standing.
  • Empowered the government to regulate contracts with gold clauses.
Cons
  • Altered the dynamics of gold ownership, transforming it from a currency to a commodity.
  • Raised legal challenges regarding the constitutionality of government actions.
  • Contributed to the suspension of the gold standard, impacting financial stability.

Frequently asked questions

How did the gold reserve act impact the U.S. dollar internationally?

The Gold Reserve Act of 1934, by fixing the price of gold and altering the gold standard, had a significant impact on the U.S. dollar internationally. The Act increased the value of the Treasury’s gold holdings, influencing the dollar’s standing in foreign exchange markets.

Did the gold reserve act completely remove the U.S. from the gold standard?

No, the Gold Reserve Act did not technically remove the U.S. from the gold standard. Instead, it granted the government more control over the domestic money supply and altered the dynamics of gold ownership, transforming it from a currency to a commodity.

How did the act affect individuals and businesses holding gold?

The Act required individuals, businesses, and entities holding gold exceeding $100 in value to remit it to the U.S. Treasury. This effectively transferred gold from private hands to government control.

Were there legal challenges against the gold reserve act?

Yes, several legal challenges, including cases like Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad and United States v. Bankers Trust Co., reached the U.S. Supreme Court in 1935. These cases tested the constitutionality of the government’s requisitioning of domestic gold.

Key takeaways

  • The Gold Reserve Act aimed to stabilize the U.S. money supply during the Great Depression.
  • The legislation transformed gold from a currency to a commodity, altering the gold standard.
  • Legal challenges, including Supreme Court cases, tested the constitutionality of the government’s actions.

Share this post:

You might also like