Skip to content
SuperMoney logo
SuperMoney logo

Lapping Schemes: Detection, Prevention, and Real-life Examples

Last updated 03/28/2024 by

Silas Bamigbola

Edited by

Fact checked by

Summary:
Discover the intricacies of lapping in accounting, a fraudulent practice where employees manipulate accounts receivables to conceal stolen cash. Learn how to detect and prevent lapping schemes and explore a detailed example illustrating the mechanics of this deceptive financial maneuver.

Lapping scheme definition

Understanding the concept of lapping in accounting is crucial for safeguarding financial integrity. A lapping scheme is a deceptive practice wherein an employee manipulates accounts receivables to obscure the misappropriation of cash.

How lapping schemes work

In a lapping scheme, an employee skews records by diverting funds from one transaction to cover the theft from another. For instance, if $150 from a sale is stolen, the employee might use the $200 from a subsequent transaction to offset the initial discrepancy. This process continues, creating a complex web of manipulated receivables.

How to detect lapping schemes

Detecting lapping schemes involves meticulous examination of cash receipt applications. If funds are consistently misapplied to the wrong customer accounts, it signals an active lapping scheme. Additionally, an employee’s reluctance to take earned vacation time might indicate their involvement in a lapping scheme, as daily presence is essential for maintaining the deception.

Indicators of lapping schemes

Other indicators include a rise in the aging of accounts receivable. While lapping can temporarily hide the theft, the eventual shortfall will surface, necessitating recording as a loss. Smaller companies, where a single person handles cash receipts and billing, are particularly vulnerable to lapping schemes.

How to prevent lapping schemes

WEIGH THE RISKS AND BENEFITS
Take proactive steps to prevent lapping schemes in your organization.
Pros
  • Implement segregation of duties between cashier and billing responsibilities.
  • Assign a non-cashier to deliver statements to customers for independent verification.
  • Audit cash receipts transactions regularly to detect anomalies.
  • Encourage all employees to take their earned vacation time.
Cons
  • Increased administrative effort to enforce segregation of duties.
  • Potential resistance from employees regarding mandatory vacation time.
  • Requires additional resources for regular cash receipt audits.

Example of a lapping scheme

Let’s delve into an example to better understand how a lapping scheme unfolds. Imagine a company receives $150 for payment, but an accounting clerk diverts that amount to a personal account. To conceal the theft, the clerk applies the $200 from a second receivable to the first, leaving $50 to be applied to the second receivable. This process continues, creating a deceptive trail within the accounting records.

Preventive measures for businesses

Companies can take various measures to mitigate the risk of lapping schemes:
  • Separate cashier and billing responsibilities to introduce a checks-and-balances system.
  • Assign someone other than the cashier to deliver statements for customer verification.
  • Regularly audit cash receipts transactions to promptly identify and address irregularities.
  • Mandate all employees to take their earned vacation time, promoting a culture of transparency.
  • Implement “For Deposit Only” markings on checks and encourage customers to pay directly to a secure lockbox.

Real-life examples of lapping schemes

Examining real-life instances of lapping schemes provides insight into the various methods employed by fraudsters. In a notorious case, an accounts receivable clerk diverted small amounts from multiple transactions over an extended period. By manipulating records, the clerk successfully concealed the ongoing theft, highlighting the need for vigilant financial oversight.
Another example involves a trusted employee who exploited their position by intercepting mailed statements. The employee, responsible for delivering statements to customers, would strategically remove certain documents to prevent detection. This method prolonged the discovery of the lapping scheme, emphasizing the importance of customer involvement in fraud prevention.

Advanced forensic techniques for detecting lapping schemes

While basic detection methods involve tracing cash receipts, advanced forensic techniques can provide a deeper understanding of lapping schemes. Utilizing data analytics, auditors can identify patterns and anomalies in accounts receivable records that may elude traditional audits.
Forensic accountants may also leverage statistical analysis to pinpoint irregularities in the distribution of payment allocations. This approach enhances the efficiency of detecting lapping schemes, especially in cases where fraudulent activities are intentionally obscured by seemingly random transactions.

Emerging technologies in lapping scheme prevention

As technology evolves, businesses have the opportunity to leverage advanced tools in preventing lapping schemes. Blockchain technology, with its decentralized and transparent nature, can be implemented to secure the integrity of financial transactions. By recording transactions in an immutable ledger, the risk of altering accounts receivables for fraudulent purposes is significantly reduced.
Additionally, artificial intelligence (AI) can play a role in identifying unusual patterns in cash receipts and customer billing. Machine learning algorithms can adapt and learn from historical data, enhancing their ability to detect anomalies that might indicate a lapping scheme in progress.

Conclusion: Staying ahead in the fight against lapping schemes

Constant vigilance, coupled with innovative approaches and advanced technologies, is paramount in staying ahead in the ongoing battle against lapping schemes. By understanding the evolving tactics of fraudsters, implementing preventive measures, and embracing emerging technologies, businesses can fortify their financial systems against the deceptive practices of those seeking to manipulate accounts receivables for personal gain.

Frequently asked questions

What is the primary motive behind lapping schemes?

Lapping schemes are primarily motivated by the intent to conceal the misappropriation of cash by manipulating accounts receivables. The perpetrators aim to create a deceptive trail within financial records to hide their fraudulent activities.

How can companies effectively implement segregation of duties?

Implementing segregation of duties involves creating a system where different individuals handle distinct financial responsibilities. For cashier and billing duties, assigning separate employees helps establish checks and balances, reducing the risk of lapping schemes.

Why are smaller companies more susceptible to lapping schemes?

Smaller companies, where a single person often handles both cash receipts and billing, are more vulnerable to lapping schemes. The limited staffing and resources make it easier for fraudulent activities to go undetected, emphasizing the need for heightened vigilance in such environments.

What role do advanced forensic techniques play in lapping scheme detection?

Advanced forensic techniques, such as data analytics and statistical analysis, play a crucial role in detecting lapping schemes. These techniques go beyond traditional audits, offering a deeper understanding of patterns and anomalies in accounts receivable records that may indicate fraudulent activities.

How can emerging technologies like blockchain contribute to lapping scheme prevention?

Emerging technologies like blockchain contribute to lapping scheme prevention by providing a decentralized and transparent system for recording financial transactions. This helps secure the integrity of accounts receivables, reducing the risk of alteration for fraudulent purposes.

Key takeaways

  • A lapping scheme involves manipulating accounts receivables to hide misappropriated cash.
  • Forensic accounting audits can reveal lapping schemes by tracing irregularities in cash receipts.
  • Preventing lapping schemes requires vigilance, segregation of duties, and regular audits.

Share this post:

You might also like