Skip to content
SuperMoney logo
SuperMoney logo

The Great Moderation: Definition, Causes, And Impacts

Last updated 03/25/2024 by

Dan Agbo

Edited by

Fact checked by

Summary:
The Great Moderation, a period of decreased macroeconomic volatility in the U.S. from the mid-1980s to 2007, marked by low inflation and positive economic growth, faced a dramatic end with the financial crisis. Explore the causes, impacts, and the role of the Federal Reserve in this economic rollercoaster.

The great moderation: Navigating economic stability

The Great Moderation, a stretch of remarkable economic calm that bathed developed nations from the mid-1980s to 2007, was a stark contrast to the turbulent decades before. Economic seas once whipped by boom-and-bust cycles grew still, with gentler swells of growth and shallower valleys of recession. Inflation, the once fiery beast of price hikes, was tamed, kept at bay by a leash far tighter than during the inflationary roars of the 60s and 70s. This newfound economic predictability offered a clear view for businesses and individuals, allowing them to chart their course and invest with confidence in a landscape less prone to sudden shifts.
While the Great Moderation wasn’t an act of economic magic, several factors orchestrated its emergence. Central banks, like skilled captains, honed their navigational skills, wielding new strategies to keep inflation in check and smooth out the economic bumps. Governments loosened their grip on certain sectors, allowing money to flow more freely and fuel stability. Technology, a helping hand, boosted productivity and efficiency, allowing economies to grow without stoking inflationary fires.
Yet, even the calmest seas can’t outrun every storm. The Great Moderation came to an abrupt end with the 2008 financial crisis, a harsh reminder that lurking beneath the surface of economic tranquility, unseen risks can brew.
The Great Moderation remains a fascinating chapter in the economic tale, sparking ongoing debates about its roots, consequences, and whether its magic can be recaptured. It serves as a reminder that even amidst economic storms, periods of calm can find their way, highlighting the importance of vigilance in navigating the ever-changing waters of our economic world.

Causes of the great moderation

In a pivotal 2004 speech, Ben Bernanke, the former Federal Reserve Chair, outlined three significant contributors to the great moderation.
  • Structural changes: Bernanke highlighted the impact of widespread technological advancements, including the integration of computers for precise business decision-making. Additionally, the financial system’s evolution, deregulation, a shift towards service-oriented industries, and increased global trade played pivotal roles.
  • Improved economic policies: The era witnessed enhanced macroeconomic policies, moderating the boom and bust cycles of the past. Sophisticated theories in monetary and fiscal policy contributed to a gradual stabilization of the U.S. economy.
  • Fortuitous elements: Bernanke noted that greater stability resulted not only from improved stabilizing forces but also from a decrease in economic shocks during this period.

The role of the Federal Reserve

Central to the great moderation was the role played by the Federal Reserve, with chairs like Paul Volcker, Alan Greenspan, and Bernanke influencing economic stability through strategic monetary policies.
  • Monetary policy frameworks: The Fed’s approach, characterized by Volcker’s tenure and continued by Greenspan and Bernanke, played a pivotal role. Deregulation, a shift towards services, and openness to trade were part of the evolving strategies that contributed to the stability.
  • Studies and reflections: Bernanke’s speech reflected on studies indicating that stability resulted not only from policy improvements but also from a decrease in economic shocks, challenging the traditional understanding of economic stability.

The fragile foundation

Examining the foundation of the great moderation unveils vulnerabilities that led to its eventual collapse during the 2008 financial crisis.
  • Imbalances in easy money policies: The Fed’s easy money policies during the great moderation allowed imbalances in the economy to accumulate over years. These imbalances, largely unchecked, eventually reached a critical point.
  • Globalization’s impact: The spread of globalization, interconnected financial markets, and the dominance of the U.S. dollar in international trade provided an outlet for the Fed’s inflationary policies. However, this global interdependence became a double-edged sword when the normal feedback mechanisms to monetary policy ceased functioning.
  • Risk and stability trade-off: The great recession marked a trade-off between short-term stability and the long-term risk of a catastrophic economic crash. Rather than allowing moderate recessions to run their course, the Fed chose to delay short-term pain, leading to a more severe and widespread economic downturn.

The bottom line

Reflecting on the Great Moderation reveals a complex interplay of factors, from structural changes and improved policies to the fragile foundations that ultimately unraveled. The failure of this era serves as a poignant reminder of the delicate balance required in economic management, emphasizing the trade-off between short-term stability and the enduring risks that shape our economic landscape.
WEIGH THE RISKS AND BENEFITS
Here is a list of the benefits and drawbacks to consider.
Pros
  • Periods of low inflation
  • Positive economic growth
  • Stabilized interest rates
Cons
  • Underlying economic vulnerabilities
  • Dependency on foreign markets
  • Short-term pain for long-term risk

Frequently asked questions

What defines the Great Moderation?

The Great Moderation refers to a period of reduced macroeconomic volatility in the U.S., characterized by low inflation and positive economic growth from the mid-1980s to 2007.

What were the causes of the Great Moderation?

Structural changes, improved economic policies, and elements of good luck, as hypothesized by Ben Bernanke, contributed to the Great Moderation.

How did the Federal Reserve influence the Great Moderation?

The Federal Reserve, under chairs like Paul Volcker and Alan Greenspan, played a crucial role in shaping the economic stability during the Great Moderation through strategic monetary policies.

What led to the failure of the Great Moderation?

The collapse of the Great Moderation resulted from imbalances in the economy, exacerbated by the Fed’s easy money policies, leading to the 2008 financial crisis.

What lessons can be learned from the Great Moderation?

The Great Moderation underscores the delicate balance between short-term stability and the long-term risks associated with economic policies.

Key takeaways

  • The Great Moderation was a period of reduced economic volatility in the U.S. from the mid-1980s to 2007.
  • Structural changes, improved economic policies, and elements of good luck contributed to stability.
  • Monetary policy frameworks influenced the economic landscape during the Great Moderation.
  • Imbalances in the economy led to the collapse of the Great Moderation, culminating in the 2008 financial crisis.
  • The trade-off between short-term stability and long-term risks is a critical aspect of economic policy.

Share this post:

You might also like