Skip to content
SuperMoney logo
SuperMoney logo

Wear and Tear Exclusion: Definition, Implications, and Examples

Last updated 02/11/2024 by

Alessandra Nicole

Edited by

Fact checked by

Summary:
A wear and tear exclusion in insurance policies denies coverage for normal deterioration of insured items. This provision is crucial to maintain affordable premiums and protect against unforeseen losses.
In the realm of insurance, wear and tear exclusions play a significant role in defining the scope of coverage provided by policies. This article delves into the concept of wear and tear exclusions, exploring what they entail, how they function, and their implications for policyholders and insurers alike.

Understanding wear and tear exclusion

A wear and tear exclusion is a standard provision found in insurance contracts. It stipulates that losses stemming from the expected degradation of insured property over time are not covered by the policy. Unlike sudden and accidental damages, which are the core focus of insurance protection, wear and tear represent predictable and ongoing deterioration inherent to the natural aging process of assets.

Exclusions are specified

Insurance policies typically contain a comprehensive list of exclusions and limitations, which serve as the criteria for determining coverage eligibility. Wear and tear exclusions are part of this list, clearly delineating the types of damages that fall outside the purview of insurance compensation. Examples of other common exclusions include poor maintenance, prior damage, manufacturing defects, or faulty installation.

When parties disagree

Disputes often arise between insurers and policyholders regarding the interpretation of wear and tear exclusions, particularly in cases involving older properties or assets. Insurance companies may attempt to invoke wear and tear to deny claims, asserting that the damage resulted from preexisting conditions rather than covered perils. Such disagreements can escalate into insurance bad faith lawsuits, especially when substantial losses are at stake.

Wear and tear exclusion and anti-concurrent cause language

Unlike provisions with “anti-concurrent cause” lead-in language, wear and tear exclusions do not address concurrent causes of loss. In the absence of such language, courts may rule in favor of coverage if a loss arises from a combination of covered and uncovered perils. This distinction underscores the importance of precise policy language in defining coverage parameters and mitigating disputes.
WEIGH THE RISKS AND BENEFITS
Here is a list of the benefits and drawbacks to consider.
Pros
  • Helps maintain affordable insurance premiums
  • Protects against unforeseen losses
Cons
  • May lead to disputes over coverage interpretation
  • Excludes coverage for expected deterioration

Frequently asked questions

What types of damages are typically excluded under wear and tear provisions?

Wear and tear exclusions usually encompass damages resulting from the normal aging process of insured items, such as gradual deterioration, rust, corrosion, or mechanical breakdowns due to regular use.

How can policyholders mitigate the impact of wear and tear exclusions?

Policyholders can proactively mitigate the effects of wear and tear exclusions by adhering to regular maintenance schedules, promptly addressing minor repairs, and setting aside funds in an emergency reserve to cover expected losses.

Key Takeaways

  • A wear and tear exclusion in insurance policies states that normal deterioration of insured objects is not covered.
  • Exclusions in insurance contracts can be extensive, and disputes may arise between insurers and insured parties.
  • Insurance companies may cite wear and tear to avoid payments, particularly in cases of natural disasters.
  • Disagreements over claims can lead to insurance bad faith lawsuits, especially with older commercial properties.
  • Wear and tear exclusions typically lack anti-concurrent cause language, which may affect coverage in cases of combined perils.

Share this post:

You might also like