Active Management: How It Works and Real-Life Examples
SB
Summary:
Active management involves professional money managers actively tracking and making decisions about investment portfolios to outperform benchmarks. This article explores the concept of active management, its strategies, pros, and cons, helping investors make informed choices in their investment journey.
Compare Investment Advisors
Compare the services, fees, and features of the leading investment advisors. Find the best firm for your portfolio.
What is active management in investing?
Active management, often referred to as active investing, is a strategy in the world of finance where investors, professional money managers, or teams of experts closely monitor the performance of an investment portfolio. They make proactive decisions to buy, hold, or sell assets within the portfolio. The primary objective of active managers is to achieve returns that surpass a specified benchmark, all while managing risks, reducing tax implications, or adhering to ethical and sustainability standards.
How active managers operate
Active managers employ a variety of tools and strategies to meet their objectives. These may include:
- Comprehensive investment analysis and research.
- Utilization of quantitative models and forecasting techniques.
- Relying on their judgment, expertise, and experience in asset selection.
The approach of active managers can range from algorithmic and data-driven to fully discretionary, depending on their investment philosophy.
Contrasting active management with passive management
It’s essential to differentiate between active management and its counterpart, passive management, often known as indexing. Passive management involves following predefined rules to replicate the performance of a market index or benchmark. Advocates of passive management argue that it eliminates human biases and tends to deliver consistent performance.
However, debates persist regarding the effectiveness of active versus passive management. It’s crucial to understand that active management seeks to outperform the broader markets, not merely track them. This strategy aims to maximize returns, manage risk, increase income, or align with specific investor goals, including sustainable investing.
Measuring success in active management
Active managers gauge their performance by comparing it to a relevant unmanaged index or market sector. For instance, a fund like the Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund may benchmark itself against the Russell 1000 Growth Index. If the fund outperforms the index, it demonstrates its active share.
Success for active managers extends beyond returns. They also assess portfolio risk and achievement of other financial objectives, which can be particularly critical for investors in or nearing retirement.
Strategies for active management
Active managers deploy a range of strategies to identify undervalued assets and profit from market opportunities. These strategies may involve:
- Thorough analysis of fundamental, quantitative, and technical indicators.
- Asset allocation aligned with the fund’s objectives.
- Adaptation to changing market conditions and innovations.
Many investment companies and mutual fund sponsors hire professional active managers to navigate dynamic market environments.
Managing risk with active management
Active managers can nimbly respond to market risks by employing various techniques such as short selling and derivatives. For example, if a global banking exchange-traded fund (ETF) faces increased risk due to external factors, an active manager may reduce exposure to mitigate potential losses.
Performance of active management
The performance of active managers is a topic of ongoing debate. Success or failure often depends on which statistics are considered. In some cases, active managers have outperformed their benchmarks, particularly in niche sectors like domestic small growth stocks.
For instance, a study revealed that over ten years ending in 2021, 88% of active managers specializing in domestic small growth stocks outperformed their benchmark indexes before fees were deducted.
Active management in real-life scenarios
Let’s delve into some real-life examples of active management strategies:
The stock picker’s success story
Imagine an experienced fund manager who specializes in technology stocks. Through rigorous analysis and market insights, they identify a lesser-known tech company poised for substantial growth. By actively managing their portfolio and making strategic buy and sell decisions, they outperform the NASDAQ Composite Index, showcasing the power of expertise in active management.
Strategic sector rotation
An active manager overseeing a diversified portfolio recognizes shifts in the economic landscape. They strategically rotate assets between sectors, reducing exposure to industries facing headwinds and increasing positions in sectors with strong growth potential. This dynamic approach aims to optimize returns and manage risk.
The active vs. passive management debate continues
The debate between active and passive management persists, with supporters on both sides presenting compelling arguments:
Active management’s counterarguments
Active management proponents argue that financial markets are not entirely efficient and that skillful managers can exploit market inefficiencies. They emphasize that active management offers a broader range of investment opportunities beyond index constituents.
Passive management’s defense
Advocates of passive management counter that most active managers fail to consistently outperform benchmarks after accounting for fees. They highlight the cost-effectiveness and simplicity of passive strategies, which align with long-term, low-cost investment goals.
Conclusion
Active management in investing involves dynamic decision-making by professional money managers to outperform benchmarks. It offers potential benefits in terms of returns and risk management, but it also comes with higher fees and debate over its superiority compared to passive management. Investors should carefully assess their goals, risk tolerance, and the expertise of active managers when considering this investment strategy.
Frequently asked question
What is the main objective of active management in investing?
The primary goal of active management is to outperform a specified benchmark while also considering factors like risk management, tax implications, and alignment with ethical or sustainability standards.
How do active managers differ from passive managers?
Active managers closely monitor and make proactive decisions about investment portfolios, aiming to exceed benchmarks. In contrast, passive managers follow predefined rules to replicate index performance.
What strategies do active managers use to achieve their objectives?
Active managers employ various strategies, including comprehensive analysis, asset allocation, and adapting to changing market conditions to identify undervalued assets and profit from market opportunities.
What are the pros and cons of active management?
Active management offers expertise and flexibility but comes with higher fees and a debate over its performance compared to passive management. Pros include the judgment of fund managers, while cons involve lower tax efficiency.
How do active managers manage risk in their portfolios?
Active managers can mitigate risk by employing techniques like short selling and derivatives. They nimbly respond to market risks and adjust their portfolios accordingly.
Is there a consensus on whether active management is superior to passive management?
No, there is no consensus. The debate continues, with arguments for and against both approaches. Investors should carefully evaluate their investment goals and risk tolerance when choosing between active and passive management.
Key takeaways
- Active management involves proactive decision-making to outperform benchmarks.
- Strategies include analysis, asset allocation, and adapting to market conditions.
- Pros of active management include expertise and flexibility, while cons include higher fees and debate over performance.
- Active managers can mitigate risk through various strategies.
- Performance varies, with some active managers outperforming benchmarks in specific sectors.
Share this post: