Skip to content
SuperMoney logo
SuperMoney logo

Moral Suasion in Finance: Explained, Applications, and Case Studies

Last updated 03/28/2024 by

Alessandra Nicole

Edited by

Fact checked by

Summary:
Moral suasion, commonly known as “jawboning,” is a strategic tool employed by central banks to influence individuals or entities through rhetorical appeals, persuasion, and implicit or explicit threats, without resorting to coercion or physical force. This article delves into the intricacies of moral suasion, exploring its applications, historical examples, and its evolving significance in the contemporary financial landscape, all presented in a professional and informational tone suitable for the finance industry.

Understanding moral suasion in finance

Moral suasion, or jawboning, is a strategic approach where central banks aim to influence the behavior of individuals or entities through persuasive communication, avoiding direct coercion or physical intervention. In the financial context, this practice is particularly associated with central banking institutions.

Exploring the dynamics of moral suasion

Moral suasion is a versatile tool that can be applied both publicly and behind closed doors. While it is a method of influencing economic actors, the motives behind its use may not always align with altruistic goals; rather, they often serve specific policy objectives.
In the U.S., the term “jawboning” reflects the verbal nature of moral suasion, distinguishing it from more forceful measures available to entities like the Federal Reserve (Fed). The Fed’s attempts to impact inflation rates without resorting to open market operations are occasionally termed “open mouth operations.
With the dwindling effectiveness of traditional monetary tools, moral suasion has gained prominence. The Fed, constrained by near-zero interest rates from 2008 to 2015, and limited ability to expand its balance sheet, resorts to transparent communication to convince markets of its commitment to economic recovery.

‘Fedspeak’ and evolving communication strategies

Moral suasion is often reflected in the communication strategies of central bank officials. A classic example is former Fed chair Alan Greenspan’s cautionary characterization of economic sentiment as “irrational exuberance” in 1996. However, when asset prices collapsed in 2000, critics argued that Greenspan’s measures, whether through interest rates, margin lending requirements, or jawboning, were insufficient to check the exuberance of the 1990s.
In recent years, the Fed has adopted an approach of increased public engagement, potentially to enhance transparency or leverage the power of moral suasion. The shift from “constructive ambiguity,” as advocated by Greenspan, to clearer communication under subsequent chairs like Ben Bernanke signifies an evolving communication strategy.
The rise of jawboning corresponds with the limited effectiveness of traditional monetary tools. Unable to significantly cut interest rates or expand its balance sheet further, the Fed emphasizes communication to convey its commitment to economic recovery.

Moral suasion on the global stage

Moral suasion is not confined to the U.S.; it has global implications. In 2012, European Central Bank (ECB) president Mario Draghi declared the ECB would do “whatever it takes” to preserve the euro. This verbal commitment played a pivotal role in stabilizing the beleaguered currency and initiating its subsequent rebound.
WEIGH THE RISKS AND BENEFITS
Here is a list of the benefits and drawbacks of moral suasion in the finance industry.
Pros
  • Enables influencing behavior without resorting to coercion or force.
  • Allows central banks to shape market sentiment and public belief in their control over the economy.
  • Provides an alternative to more forceful economic interventions, potentially minimizing harm.
Cons
  • Effectiveness is contingent on public perception and interpretation.
  • Verbal gestures and signaling can be subject to misinterpretation or skepticism.
  • May create the perception of entities being “too big to fail,” potentially distorting market dynamics.

Frequently asked questions

How effective is moral suasion in influencing economic behavior?

The effectiveness of moral suasion in influencing economic behavior can be subjective and often depends on public perception. Verbal gestures and signaling, while powerful, may face scrutiny or misinterpretation.

Are there alternative tools for central banks to influence the economy?

Central banks have traditionally employed various tools, including open market operations and interest rate adjustments. However, with the limited effectiveness of these tools, moral suasion has become more prevalent, allowing central banks to convey their commitment to economic recovery through communication.

Key takeaways

  • Moral suasion relies on rhetorical appeals, persuasion, and implicit threats to shape behavior.
  • Central banks use moral suasion to influence market sentiment and public perception of their control over the economy.
  • Verbal communication, such as central bank minutes, is a common tool in the practice of moral suasion.
  • The New York Federal Reserve’s intervention in the LTCM bailout in 1998 serves as a notable example of moral suasion.
  • Moral suasion is often referred to as “jawboning” in the U.S. financial sector.

Share this post:

You might also like